Comments on: Kevorkian – Devil or Saint? http://www.idiotbrain.com/kevorkian-devil-or-saint/2007-06-01 Profiling the Biggest Idiots in the World Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:20:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: Non-tard http://www.idiotbrain.com/kevorkian-devil-or-saint/2007-06-01/comment-page-1#comment-3944 Non-tard Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:24:21 +0000 http://www.idiotbrain.com/kevorkian-devil-or-saint/2007-06-01#comment-3944 to steve preston - you appear to be missing the point about assisted suicide. if these people could get up, drive to the nearest lake and drown themselves, they would. they are in constant pain, and unable in most cases to even move, let alone kill themselves. this is why people have to administer pain relief for them. now do you understand? i'm not even going to bother going into how retarded the rest of your comment was. to steve preston – you appear to be missing the point about assisted suicide. if these people could get up, drive to the nearest lake and drown themselves, they would. they are in constant pain, and unable in most cases to even move, let alone kill themselves. this is why people have to administer pain relief for them. now do you understand?

i’m not even going to bother going into how retarded the rest of your comment was.

]]> By: Jon Craft http://www.idiotbrain.com/kevorkian-devil-or-saint/2007-06-01/comment-page-1#comment-3149 Jon Craft Sat, 03 May 2008 20:38:34 +0000 http://www.idiotbrain.com/kevorkian-devil-or-saint/2007-06-01#comment-3149 "The creator" has just as much place in this argument as the church has in legislation. Endorsing abortion and suicide are two completely different issues as in both cases the person (or fetus) has the potential for a healthy and relatively pain free life. This is not the case with the terminally ill patients in question. Standing idly while a person suffers is a violation of the Hippocratic Oath, and I don't see why the legal system has any right to stand in the way of benevolence. “The creator” has just as much place in this argument as the church has in legislation. Endorsing abortion and suicide are two completely different issues as in both cases the person (or fetus) has the potential for a healthy and relatively pain free life. This is not the case with the terminally ill patients in question. Standing idly while a person suffers is a violation of the Hippocratic Oath, and I don’t see why the legal system has any right to stand in the way of benevolence.

]]> By: Steve Preston http://www.idiotbrain.com/kevorkian-devil-or-saint/2007-06-01/comment-page-1#comment-122 Steve Preston Sat, 02 Jun 2007 00:18:09 +0000 http://www.idiotbrain.com/kevorkian-devil-or-saint/2007-06-01#comment-122 The only people that would endorse a Kevorkian are those who would also endorse abortion and suicide. No one has a "right" to end a life; their own or anyone else's. Only the creator has the right to take away what was given all of us. Where would this end? What if someone cannot not speak or clearly communicate? Would someone then have the right to make that decision (to end their life) because they "know" them well? If someone is so intent on dying, don't be the coward and ask someone else to do it for you. The only people that would endorse a Kevorkian are those who would also endorse abortion and suicide. No one has a “right” to end a life; their own or anyone else’s. Only the creator has the right to take away what was given all of us. Where would this end? What if someone cannot not speak or clearly communicate? Would someone then have the right to make that decision (to end their life) because they “know” them well? If someone is so intent on dying, don’t be the coward and ask someone else to do it for you.

]]>